The CBI had examined the CCTV footage of the day of crime– September 8– and alleged that a Class 11 student, who was known to the victim

The CBI had examined the CCTV footage of the day of crime– September 8– and alleged that a Class 11 student, who was known to the victim, allegedly committed the crime to get the exams postponed. The agency had claimed that the accused was not good at studies, and that he admitted to committing the crime. CBI’s claims were later refuted by the boy’s father, alleging that the agency coerced the accused to admit to the crime he never committed.