Supreme Court says that 2016 amendment to the Benami act does not have a retrospective effect, says Section 3(2) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act 1988 is unconstitutional, and Section 3(2) of the 2016 Amended act is unconstitutional.
Supreme Court says that 2016 amendment to the Benami act does not have a retrospective effect, says Section 3(2) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act 1988 is unconstitutional, and Section 3(2) of the 2016 Amended act is unconstitutional.
