South Africa Covid-19 strain arm less effective against vaccines

COVID-19: S Africa strain less effective against vaccines

Dr K K Aggarwal

President CMAAO, HCFI,

With input from Dr Monica Vasudev

29th January

COVID-19: S Africa strain less effective against vaccines: Good News, Bad News for Novavax COVID Vaccine: Encouraging British data; but results from South Africa bring more questions than answers

1. Novavax uses nanoparticle technology and a proprietary adjuvant with the recombinant protein. The vaccine can be stored at 2º to 8º C and shipped in a ready-to-use liquid formulation.

2. The vaccine is a recombinant version of the coronavirus spike protein, produced in insect cells, and thus represents a relatively conventional technology that also differs from the COVID-19 vaccines now in distribution.

3. The protein-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate demonstrated nearly 90% efficacy against COVID-19, in a cohort where half the cases were due to the new U.K. variant. BUT in South Africa trial, the overall vaccine efficacy was under 50% against cases largely due to the trickier South African variant.

4. Study suggested prior infection with the wild-type strain may not fully protect against new infection from the variant strain.

5. UK ARM: In an interim analysis of a phase III trial conducted in Great Britain, 89.3% efficacy was achieved against PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19. This was based on 62 COVID-19 cases among some 15,000 participants, with 56 observed in the placebo group and six in those receiving the active vaccine. Of these 62 cases, only one was classified as severe.

6. A preliminary analysis indicated that 32 of the 62 cases were the so-called U.K. coronavirus variant.

7. Based on PCR testing, vaccine efficacy was 95.6% against the original COVID-19 strain and 85.6% against the U.K. variant strain in the post-hoc analysis.

8. The phase III study enrolled adults ages 18-84, including 27% age 65 and older. The primary endpoint was PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 at least 7 days after the second of the two-dose regimen in serologically negative participants.

9. Safety data indicated that adverse events were infrequent and mostly comparable between groups

10. South Africa Arm: Phase IIb trial in South Africa in which about 6% of participants were HIV-positive. Here, the vaccine showed 60% efficacy in the HIV-negative population; it was much less effective in the HIV-infected participants, leading to overall vaccine efficacy of 49.4% for the entire study population.

11. There were 29 COVID-19 cases in the placebo group (one severe) and 15 in the vaccine group (none severe). Most 25/27 involved South African variant.

12. The trial enrolled over 4,400 patients starting in August, with data from September through mid-January.

13. However, about a third of patients enrolled were seropositive for COVID-19 infection at baseline. Based on when the trial started, pre-trial infections were thought to be caused by the original non-variant strain, while infections occurring during the trial were variant virus.

14. These data suggest that prior infection with COVID-19 may not completely protect against subsequent infection by the South Africa escape variant

15. Plans are underway to develop a booster dose and/or combination bivalent vaccine for the new strains, and to test these new vaccines in the second quarter of 2021.